
This article presents an astrological and political analysis of the September 2025 assassination of Charlie Kirk, exploring his natal chart, the timing of the event, and the hidden motives that may have been at play

Charlie Kirk’s chart reminds me of John Lennon to some extent, but more radical. Both were Libras with Mercury in Scorpio and Venus in Virgo, which shows an unselfish side in love and a deep urge to help the underdog. However, Saturn opposing Venus in Kirk’s chart made him insensitive to the needs of others at times and rather inhibited in love (little finder isolated from the rest).
Charlie’s Mercury in Scorpio was close to Mars in Scorpio, which made him frank to the point of bluntness, seeing everything in black and white, and radical in his rejection of the mainstream. What made this more intense was Mercury conjunct Pluto in Scorpio.
This side of his chart shows what happens when you violate divine truth or come to the wrong conclusions, change the system but you can’t easily undo the damage if you are wrong. It’s also the hallmark of those who investigate deeply but are unable to reveal the truth because powerful forces prevent them. He was clearly a born researcher, authentic even when radical.
Most of his attitude toward woke ideology was probably correct, but the way he expressed himself rubbed many people the wrong way. In this respect he was not diplomatic like a Libra at all, but more like an extreme Scorpio type.
Venus in Virgo gave him a sincere wish to help the underdog. He must have been unselfish and caring toward the poor and needy. But his blindness to the suffering of Palestinians was a direct result of Mercury, Mars, and Pluto all in Scorpio - a sign that loves power and can even be cruel at times toward the weak.
His chart also resembles that of New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, another Libra with Venus in Virgo and Mercury in Scorpio. However, Mamdani has a more principled chart, but he too is in danger and must be careful of the same powers that undermined Charlie Kirk.
![]()
Mars was transiting his 11th house, the area of crowds and community, exactly as it was in Mahatma Gandhi’s case. At the same time, Mars was squaring his natal Uranus, which points to danger from guns and sudden explosions, as well as squaring Neptune.
Adverse Mars - Neptune transits often mark a nightmare period, as we also saw in the charts of Princess Diana and many others.


Mars also touched his natal Jupiter, encouraging him to take chances, while the Moon on his Jupiter brought joy at the size of the crowd, lowering his defenses. All of this made him oblivious to the imminent danger.
Mars was also moving close to his 12th house, a major house of health, hospitals, and secret enemies, which made the situation even more serious.
Saturn was just rising in his chart, showing that he was gaining more and more popularity. He was also born with Sun and Mercury in his 10th house of fame and publicity, making him very much a public figure whose life and destiny played out on a visible stage.
![]()

The event chart itself had Scorpio rising, which always brings danger from intrigue, dark forces, hatred, and vindictiveness.
In fact, in our Astrocalendar we show the Ascendant on the eastern horizon in real time, and this was a textbook example of Scorpio Ascendant amplifying the potential for destructive forces far more than at other times.
![]()

When you compare the chart of the shooter with Charlie Kirk’s, it clerly shows specific points of violent connection. The most relevant and dangerous aspect is Tyler’s Mars conjunct Kirk’s Uranus, showing danger from guns and explosoins. Tyler’s Mars also conjunct Kirk’s Neptune, repeating the nightmare theme for that entire age group.
![]()
(anti-woke, free markets, America First, guns, pro-life, etc.). Charlie Kirk built his career as a culture warrior. He opposed woke ideology, which he described as cultural Marxism, and called for its defeat. He championed free markets, defended America First immigration and foreign policies, supported school choice, and denounced what he saw as indoctrination in education.
He was uncompromising on the Second Amendment and pro-life issues. His style was populist, confrontational, and aimed at mobilizing young conservatives outside the mainstream press.
Charlie Kirk was one of the strongest conservative voices in America defending Israel. He insisted that Israel had every right to defend itself and that eradicating Hamas was a necessary military objective. He dismissed accusations of genocide in Gaza, arguing that civilian deaths were caused by Hamas using human shields.
He criticized pro-Palestinian protests as antisemitic and condemned the Biden administration for not showing full, unconditional support.
Candace Owens took the opposite view. She accused Israel of genocide and condemned its military campaign in Gaza. She opposed American military and financial aid to Israel, while still condemning Hamas.
Her perspective was anti-establishment and anti-interventionist, clashing directly with Kirk’s pro-Israel line.
Owens and Kirk had been allies since 2017, but by mid-2024 their relationship had fractured over this issue.
Owens later claimed that Kirk was starting to turn. She pointed to a Hamptons gathering where billionaire Bill Ackman pressured him to visit Israel. Ackman denied the story but his ideology makes it suspect. Ackman is a staunch Zionist, and a prominent public defender of Israel.
Long before the Gaza war, he spoke about Zionism as Jewish self-determination and positioned himself against critics of Israel. After 2023, he became a visible activist in U.S. debates over antisemitism and Israel, linking him to the same networks Kirk moved in.
Until mid-2025, Kirk never wavered in his support for Israel. However, in July 2025, he publicly complained that he had less ability online to criticize the Israeli government than Israelis themselves.
This was a departure from his past tone and marked the first public hint of frustration. Owens pointed to this as proof that Kirk was changing. Whether this was the start of a real shift or just a stray comment, it took on new significance after his assassination as it may have been seen as a threat to foreign powers.
The alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, was 22 years old. Prosecutors say he had recently become more leftist, was supportive of LGBTQ+ rights, and lived with a trans partner. Investigators seized messages where he expressed anger at what he saw as Kirk’s hatred toward trans people.
The official narrative is that his motive was cultural, rooted in Kirk’s domestic rhetoric on gender and identity, not foreign policy or Israel.
The gap between venting in private texts and carrying out the assassination of a national figure is wide. This is where suspicions of outside influence appear.
Robinson fit the profile of a patsy: very young, with a recent ideological shift, tied to a marginalized community, and increasingly hostile to a political figure. Such volatility makes someone either a tool pushed toward violence or a scapegoat afterward.
Robinson’s digital trail of angry posts and private chats could have been detected by intelligence or political operators who monitor such spaces. His personal life placed him in social environments where hostility toward Charlie Kirk was common, making his anger more visible. If he had ever been flagged by schools, police, or counselors, that would have created another layer of visibility.
It is possible that outside forces saw him as a convenient patsy. His resentment of Kirk provided a ready-made motive. They would not need to invent one, only to direct it.
In that scenario, Robinson’s hatred becomes the public explanation while the deeper objective is the elimination of a high-profile conservative voice who had begun to edge away from the established line on Israel.
![]()
You can go to our Homepage and enter your date in the Immune System Calcualtor we put there and warn each other to be aware of the danger when there is a Mars Neptune transit. You can use this calcualtor to find out when you are in a nightmare configuratoin and take precautions and warn others as well. It is an obsessive transit but the form of obsession is your free choice.

Here is the article which gives the age groups who are prone to the stressful aspects next and this is the same Mars Neptune transit which repeats itself every few months.
